In Colorado, people have been fretting about the lowly pine beetle for some time now.
Why?
Because estimates are that all–that’s right ALL–the mature lodgepole pine in the state will be dead within four years–or so says a year old Denver Post article “Beetle Scourge Goes from Bad to Worse.”
How significant is this? Check out some of the statistics from this old article:
The bark beetle infestation ravaged 500,000 new acres of forests in Colorado in 2007, bringing the total infestation to 1.5 million acres — almost all of state’s lodgepole forests — according to the latest aerial survey. The infestation has now worked its way north and east, including an increase of more than 1,500 percent in the acreage affected in Boulder and Larimer counties.
The local ag college has a fact sheet on what can be done. I read it and became depressed. In short, I don’t see anyone doing this for the million and a half acres of affected lodgepoles in the state. That is–they are doomed. The mountain landscape of the state will change.
One of the agreed upon causes of this catastrophic infestation is that of late Colorado winters have not had extended periods of sub-zero temperatures, one of the natural controls for pine beetle populations.
And now that the trees are dying, we have to worry about more forest fires. We in Colorado expect fires–especially when, as now, we are in a major drought.
But how many of us are prepared for the dead trees adding to the CO2 problem?
I read somewhere that in Europe last year trees added to the carbon dioxide problem. Today came more news: “Forests Could Flip from Sink to Source of CO2: Study.”
Boy, I’m so glad all those skeptics keep telling us that the globe is cooling, but they need to tell it to the trees.
Cassandra